⚡ Diagnostic Procedure (Neurophysiology)

Nerve Conduction Study: Nursing Guide

A nerve conduction study (NCS) measures how fast and strongly electrical signals travel through peripheral nerves using surface electrodes and brief stimulation — often paired with electromyography when weakness or sensory change suggests nerve injury. Nurses protect validity with lotion-free skin, warm extremities, implanted device screening, and urgent escalation when weakness is rapidly progressive.

13 min read
Updated June 20, 2026
Medically Reviewed
Written by
Sid A. Abdala Balal
RN — Registered Nurse
Medically Reviewed by
Dr. Adam Sayedi
MD — Medical Doctor

Contents

Overview Safety Note Can / Cannot Safety Check Recording Validity Related Tests Workflow Why It Is Ordered Patient Preparation Specimen / Procedure Results & Interpretation Urgent Findings Nursing Responsibilities Documentation Patient Education Nerve Conduction Study NCLEX practice questions FAQ References Related Topics Editorial Review

Quick Facts

Category
Diagnostic procedure
Procedure type
Surface electrode nerve stimulation
Main nursing risk
Invalid prep or missed progressive weakness
Turnaround
Often 20–45 min

Key Takeaway

The main nursing priority with nerve conduction studies is ensuring lotion-free warm skin, pacemaker or ICD clearance before electrical stimulation, and escalating rapidly progressive weakness or new respiratory symptoms — not interpreting

Procedure Safety Checklist

Pre-procedure safety checks — confirm each item before the patient leaves the ward or clinic.

  1. Correct patient, NCS order, and symptomatic limb(s) documented

  2. Pacemaker, ICD, or implanted electrical device history reviewed

  3. Skin free of lotions, creams, oils, and heavy jewelry on test sites

  4. Extremities warm enough for valid conduction recordings

  5. Progressive weakness, numbness, or foot-drop pattern charted

  6. Anticoagulant disclosure when needle EMG is scheduled the same visit

  7. Loose clothing allowing access to arms or legs being tested

  8. Patient coached about brief shock sensations and when to report worsening symptoms

Sedation

Not usually required — explain stimulation sensations and support anxiety instead

What is Nerve Conduction Study?

Nerve Conduction Study is a diagnostic test that measures how quickly and strongly electrical signals move through peripheral nerves. Per the standard clinical references Medical Encyclopedia, surface electrodes deliver small electrical pulses while recording equipment tracks nerve response — often during the same visit as electromyography when clinicians need to separate nerve injury from muscle disease.

Overview

Nurses encounter nerve conduction study referrals in outpatient neurology clinics, neurophysiology laboratories, and inpatient units when patients report numbness, tingling, or weakness. The NHS describes nerve conduction studies as tests that show how well nerves are working. Nurses coordinate screening, skin and temperature preparation, transport, comfort during stimulation, and communication when results may change neurologic management.

Unlike bedside sensation checks alone, nerve conduction studies provide objective electrophysiology data that may localize focal entrapment or generalized neuropathy when interpreted with history and examination. Nurses should not assign the final diagnosis — but should recognize when prep errors, cool limbs, or unscreened implanted devices make the study invalid or unsafe until clarified with the neurophysiology team.

Clinical Nursing Focus

Before nerve conduction studies, confirm implanted-device history, ensure lotion-free skin and warm extremities, and document progressive weakness onset. After testing, reinforce activity guidance, track neurology follow-up, and escalate rapidly worsening weakness, new bulbar symptoms, or respiratory decline according to facility policy — even when the formal report is still pending.

Electrical Stimulation, Device Screening, and Recording Validity Safety

Nerve conduction studies require implanted-device screening, lotion-free skin, and warm extremities for valid recordings. Progressive weakness with bulbar or respiratory symptoms is a time-sensitive neurologic concern — nurses must not treat abnormal preliminary findings as routine when symptoms are worsening.

Highest-risk scenarios
  • Pacemaker or ICD history without device-team clearance before electrical stimulation
  • Lotion or oil on skin and cool extremities producing invalid conduction data
  • Rapidly progressive weakness, new dysphagia, or respiratory decline
  • Bilateral ascending weakness suggesting acute neuromuscular emergency
  • Major management decisions based on a study performed through invalid prep

Document: device clearance, skin prep, limb warmth, stimulation tolerance, and escalation calls.

What Nerve Conduction Studies Can and Cannot Tell You

This test can help identify:

  • Slowed conduction, amplitude loss, or conduction block in symptomatic nerves
  • Focal entrapment patterns such as median neuropathy at the wrist
  • Generalized peripheral neuropathy distribution on multi-nerve testing
  • Need for neurology follow-up when electrophysiology supports active nerve injury

This test cannot:

  • Diagnose every cause of numbness without clinical and imaging correlation
  • Replace pacemaker or ICD screening before electrical stimulation
  • Produce valid data through lotion-covered or cold limbs
  • Rule out rapidly progressive neuromuscular emergencies when symptoms are worsening

Pre-study Checks Before Nerve Conduction Testing

Verify

✓Correct patient and NCS order with symptomatic limb documented
✓Pacemaker, ICD, or implanted electrical device clearance when required
✓Skin free of lotions, creams, and oils on test day
✓Extremities warm enough for valid nerve conduction recordings
✓Jewelry or braces removed from electrode sites
✓Progressive weakness onset and sensory pattern charted

Clarify before proceeding when:

  • Patient applied lotion or oil to limbs scheduled for surface electrode placement
  • Limb is cool with delayed capillary refill and warming has not been attempted
  • Pacemaker or ICD history is present without device-team guidance for nerve stimulation
  • Weakness is rapidly progressive with new bulbar or respiratory symptoms
  • Metal bracelet or tight wrap covers the planned recording site
  • Patient cannot cooperate and rescheduling has not been arranged
  • Normal bedside strength conflicts with worsening foot drop — confirm urgency pathway

Electrode Contact, Limb Temperature, and Valid Recordings

Electrode contact, limb temperature, and stimulation site access determine whether recorded velocities and amplitudes reflect true nerve function.

Validity factorWhy it mattersNursing action
Lotion-free skinOils reduce electrode adhesion and signal qualityRemove products; clean per clinic protocol before stimulation
Limb temperatureCool nerves conduct more slowly and may mimic diseaseWarm extremities with blanket or approved method; document time warmed
Implanted devicesElectrical stimulation may require modified protocolConfirm device clearance before first pulse
Site accessJewelry, edema, or dressings block electrode placementRemove interference and notify neurophysiology if placement is limited
↔ On a small screen, swipe or scroll sideways to see the full table.

Neurophysiology Tests That Complement NCS

Related test / assessmentWhy it may be ordered
Electromyography (EMG)Assesses muscle electrical activity — commonly paired in one visit when weakness suggests nerve or muscle disease
Brain MRICentral nervous system evaluation when upper motor neuron signs or multifocal symptoms are suspected
Lumbar spine MRIRoot compression assessment when radiculopathy is in the differential
Glucose and HbA1cMetabolic context when diabetic neuropathy is suspected per prescriber
Vitamin B12 levelTreatable deficiency screening in polyneuropathy workups per pathway
↔ On a small screen, swipe or scroll sideways to see the full table.

Nerve Conduction Studies in Outpatient and Inpatient Referral Pathways

Diagnostic safety badge: Non-invasive electrophysiology — device, skin-prep, and temperature checks affect validity; rapidly progressive weakness upgrades to urgent neurology pathway.

Check-before-test protocol

  1. Identity + order + symptomatic limb
  2. Implanted electrical device clearance
  3. Lotion-free skin and limb warming
  4. Jewelry removal and electrode site access
  5. Post-test symptom check and result communication

Critical teach-back questions

  • “Can you tell me when the numbness or weakness started and whether it is getting worse?”
  • “Which symptoms — trouble breathing, swallowing, or rapidly spreading weakness — should you report right away?”
  • “Why is it important to arrive without lotion on the skin being tested?”

Care coordination: primary prescriber, neurology, neurophysiology, device team when indicated, and rehabilitation services when weakness affects mobility.

Why Nerve Conduction Study is Ordered

Nerve conduction studies are ordered when clinicians need objective data about peripheral nerve function beyond examination alone.

Clinical Indication What the Test Answers Nursing Rationale
Numbness, tingling, or burning in a limb Is there measurable slowing or amplitude loss in the symptomatic nerve? Supports evaluation of sensory patterns that may reflect diabetic neuropathy or focal entrapment indications.
Progressive weakness or foot drop Does conduction block or slowed velocity match the weak segment? Pairs with muscle weakness findings and may guide urgent neurology follow-up when electrophysiology supports active nerve injury.
Suspected focal entrapment neuropathy Are median, ulnar, or peroneal segments affected at classic compression sites? Commonly used when carpal tunnel syndrome or other entrapment remains in the differential.
Differentiating nerve versus muscle disease in a workup Do nerve conduction patterns support peripheral nerve injury rather than primary myopathy? Often paired with electromyography when prescriber pathway requires muscle and nerve correlation; imaging may follow when structural compression remains suspected.
↔ On a small screen, swipe or scroll sideways to see the full table.

Contraindications and Precautions

There is no single absolute contraindication to all nerve conduction studies, but testing should be deferred or modified when implanted electrical devices require specialist clearance, skin is contaminated with oils, the limb is too cold for valid recordings, or progressive weakness suggests a time-sensitive neuromuscular emergency.

When nerve conduction studies may be unsafe or misleading
  • Pacemaker or implanted cardioverter-defibrillator history without device-team clearance before electrical stimulation per institutional protocol.
  • Lotion, cream, or oil on skin — poor electrode contact can invalidate recordings per NHS and standard clinical references preparation guidance.
  • Cool or vasoconstricted extremities — conduction velocities and amplitudes may appear falsely abnormal until the limb is warmed.
Patient and coordination factors
  • Rapidly progressive weakness, new dysphagia, or respiratory symptoms — may require urgent neurology assessment independent of outpatient NCS timing.
  • Metallic jewelry, thick braces, or edema over electrode sites — may interfere with placement; remove or adjust per neurophysiology guidance.
  • Severe anxiety or inability to remain still — may require rescheduling or additional support per clinic protocol.
Escalate If
  • Rapidly progressive weakness, new bulbar symptoms, or respiratory effort decline — escalate to responsible clinician before routine outpatient timing alone.
  • Bilateral ascending weakness with autonomic symptoms — urgent neurology review per facility policy even if NCS is scheduled.
  • Preliminary conduction abnormality with clinical deterioration — coordinate neurology follow-up and repeat examination; do not dismiss symptoms because testing finished.

Patient Preparation

Preparation focuses on implanted-device screening, lotion-free skin, limb warmth, symptom documentation, and patient coaching about brief stimulation sensations.

Pre-test checks
✓Verify order, indication, and which limb(s) or nerves are symptomatic.
✓Document weakness or sensory onset and whether symptoms are progressive.
✓Confirm pacemaker, ICD, or other implanted electrical device history.
✓Ensure skin is free of lotions, creams, and oils on the day of testing.
✓Warm cool extremities with blankets or approved methods when validity is at risk.
✓Explain brief shock or tingling sensations during stimulation and the need to report worsening weakness afterward.
Medications to Review or Hold

When needle EMG is scheduled the same visit, document anticoagulant and antiplatelet medicines and follow prescriber or neurophysiology clearance plans — do not stop prescribed therapy without orders. For NCS-only visits, medicine review focuses on medicines affecting neuropathy workup per prescriber rather than independent holds.

Where the test is performed

This page is a Tests & Diagnostics guide for Nerve Conduction Study. It emphasizes why the test is ordered, how to interpret results, when to escalate, and preparation factors that affect validity — not step-by-step performance technique (those live under Nursing Procedures when available).

Nerve Conduction Study is usually performed or finalized outside the bedside nursing procedure library (for example central laboratory or imaging services). This guide focuses on orders, preparation that affects validity, interpretation, and escalation.

Use the preparation, results, and nursing responsibility sections below for safety checks, interpretation, escalation, and documentation — not equipment operation or departmental imaging protocols.

Result follow-up at a glance

Nursing workflow on this page — from order to safe action on results:

1
Confirm indication & correct order
2
Coordinate with laboratory or radiology per local policy
3
Document pre-analytic preparation & timing
4
Review result with trend & clinical picture
5
Escalate critical or discordant findings
6
Document communication & patient teaching

Results and Interpretation

Nerve conduction study results are reported as descriptive electrophysiology findings — for example slowed conduction velocity, prolonged latency, reduced amplitude, or conduction block. standard clinical references and the NHS emphasize interpretation by a trained specialist in context of examination and history. Nurses correlate reports with symptoms and escalation pathways rather than applying universal numeric cutoffs.

Reference Range Disclaimer

Reference ranges, critical values, and protocols may vary by laboratory, institution, patient population, and testing method. Always follow local policy and the reporting laboratory’s reference range.

Result Range / Finding Clinical Meaning Nursing Action
No acute critical finding / as expected for indication Conduction velocity and amplitude within expected limits for tested segments No electrophysiologic evidence of significant nerve dysfunction in tested segments Continue symptom surveillance; follow prescriber plan if sensory symptoms persist
Equivocal / indeterminate finding Mild slowing or amplitude change of uncertain clinical significance May require correlation with examination, repeat study after warming, or additional testing Communicate to neurology; avoid dismissing progressive symptoms because findings are mild
Abnormal finding — clinically significant Definite conduction block, marked slowing, or amplitude loss in symptomatic segments May support peripheral neuropathy, radiculopathy, or entrapment neuropathy depending on distribution — final diagnosis requires specialist synthesis. Communicate to prescriber/neurology; reinforce activity and fall precautions when weakness is progressive; arrange follow-up testing per pathway
Not applicable Not applicable — nerve conduction reports describe patterns and amplitudes, not low laboratory numeric values Not applicable for electrophysiology reporting Interpret using distribution, symptoms, and specialist report
↔ On a small screen, swipe or scroll sideways to see the full table.

Urgent Findings and Escalation

Nerve conduction studies do not use laboratory critical values. Urgent nursing action depends on progressive weakness, respiratory symptoms, invalid prep driving major decisions, and rapid clinical deterioration.

Critical Finding Threshold / Value Immediate Action
Rapidly progressive weakness with bulbar or respiratory symptoms New dysphagia, dysarthria, neck weakness, or declining vital capacity Escalate to responsible clinician/neurology immediately per facility policy — do not delay for routine outpatient NCS reporting alone
Bilateral ascending weakness with autonomic change Leg weakness spreading over hours to days with new dyspnea or tachycardia Urgent neurology assessment and monitored care per facility policy — treat clinical deterioration, not only scheduled electrophysiology
Invalid study driving major decisions Lotion-contaminated skin, cold limb, or incomplete device clearance Do not conclude absence of neuropathy from invalid data — repeat after correction per neurophysiology guidance
↔ On a small screen, swipe or scroll sideways to see the full table.
Stop and Escalate

Stop routine scheduling and escalate according to facility policy when weakness is rapidly progressive, respiratory effort declines, or preliminary conduction findings conflict with worsening examination — even if NCS is incomplete or the formal report is pending.

Factors Affecting Results

Nerve conduction validity can be affected by skin prep, limb temperature, edema, anatomic variants, and recent limb trauma.

False Positives
  • Cool extremities mimicking neuropathy until adequately warmed
  • Lotion or oil reducing surface electrode contact
  • Mild compression from jewelry or tight wraps at recording sites
False Negatives
  • Early neuropathy with symptoms outpacing electrophysiologic changes
  • Focal study missing clinically involved nerves or segments
  • Severe edema limiting adequate electrode placement
Interfering Factors
  • Implanted devices requiring modified stimulation protocols
  • Anatomic variation or prior surgery altering nerve course
  • Inability to tolerate stimulation limiting complete nerve assessment
Test Limitations

Nerve conduction studies do not diagnose every cause of numbness or weakness, do not replace imaging when structural cord or root compression is suspected, and may be normal early in some neuropathies. A normal study does not exclude neuromuscular junction disorders without appropriate serologic and clinical correlation. Reference ranges, critical values, and protocols may vary by laboratory, institution, patient population, and testing method. Always follow local policy and the reporting laboratory’s reference range.

Nursing Responsibilities

Nursing care centers on valid prep, device screening, comfort during stimulation, patient teaching, and timely escalation of progressive weakness.

Before the Test
✓Review indication, limb involved, and sensory or weakness onset
✓Screen pacemaker, ICD, and implanted electrical devices
✓Confirm lotion-free skin and plan limb warming when needed
✓Coordinate transport and anxiety support; document baseline neurologic findings per orders
During the Test
✓Maintain privacy and positioning for electrode access
✓Observe for vasovagal symptoms during electrical stimulation
✓Document device clearance before stimulation per protocol
After the Test
✓Reassess affected limb strength and sensation after testing
✓Communicate progressive weakness to prescriber even if report pending
✓Reinforce activity guidance and fall precautions when weakness present
✓Teach when to report new foot drop, dyspnea, or rapidly spreading weakness

Documentation

Clear documentation supports valid nerve conduction recordings and neurology follow-up.

Example Nursing Note

“NCS referral verified 0930. 58-year-old female reports 8-week bilateral hand tingling worse at night. Pacemaker history noted; device team clearance documented on chart. Lotion removed from forearms; hands warmed 12 min before stimulation. Tolerated brief electrical pulses with mild discomfort only. Post-test grip strength unchanged; continued night symptoms. Patient taught to report spreading weakness or dyspnea. Neurology follow-up appointment confirmed; formal NCS report pending.”

Key Documentation Points
  • Indication, limb involved, and symptom onset timeline
  • Device screening and clearance plan before stimulation
  • Skin prep, limb warmth measures, and cooperation notes
  • Post-test symptom check and tolerance of stimulation
  • Urgent communication and read-back when required by policy
  • Teaching on return precautions and follow-up plan

Patient and Family Education

Use plain language; emphasize that brief tingling or shock sensations are expected and that reporting worsening weakness matters after the visit.

✓Explain that surface electrodes record how nerves carry electrical signals — no needles for the nerve conduction portion
✓Describe brief shock or tingling sensations during stimulation per NHS patient information guidance
✓Ask about lotion use and instruct to arrive with clean, dry skin
✓Review why cool hands or feet may need warming before testing for accurate results
✓Clarify that results may take specialist interpretation after the session
✓Provide written follow-up instructions when available; confirm how results will be communicated
📚

Nerve Conduction Study NCLEX practice questions

Practice NCLEX-style clinical judgment focused on Nerve Conduction Study safety and nursing judgment. Use the case tabs (orders, results, assessment, nursing notes), then answer eight Next Gen–style items (including an ordered workflow step) and evaluate outcomes with the answer key.

Select a tab to view orders, results, assessment, and nursing note details for this case.

  • Order: Bilateral upper-extremity nerve conduction studies; neurology follow-up pending
  • Indication: 58-year-old female — bilateral hand tingling worse at night × 8 weeks
  • Timing: Outpatient neurophysiology appointment 1000; patient arrived with hand lotion
  • Related orders: No same-day EMG; wrist splint at home; BMP and A1c on chart
Question 1 — Priority action

After reviewing the case tabs, what is the nurse’s priority action before nerve conduction studies proceed?

Question 2 — Recognize cues

Which findings from the case tabs should prompt the nurse to clarify or escalate before routine follow-up only? Select all that apply. Select all that apply

Question 3 — Trend interpretation

Which trends are most concerning when evaluating whether the plan is working? Select all that apply.

Trend snapshot
Night tingling unchanged; hands cool on exam; grip 5/5 bilaterally today

Select all that apply

Question 4 — Matrix judgment

Classify each finding for this patient:

Finding Expected — document and continue monitoring Requires follow-up — notify team / repeat test Urgent — immediate escalation
Stable vitals, mild stimulation discomfort only, and grip strength unchanged after testing
Hand lotion and cool extremities before electrode placement
New bilateral leg weakness and dyspnea four hours after testing
Preliminary slowed median conduction with scheduled neurology follow-up in two weeks

On a small screen, swipe or scroll sideways to see the full table.

Question 5 — Clinical judgment

A colleague says nerve conduction studies should start now because warming the hands will waste clinic time. What is the best response?

Question 6 — Documentation (cloze)

Complete the priority documentation phrase after today’s nerve conduction visit:

The highest-priority documentation action is .

Question 7 — Workflow (ordered response)

Before nerve conduction studies for bilateral hand tingling, rank the nurse’s actions (1 = first).

  1. Verify identity, indication, and symptomatic limbs match the order
  2. Confirm pacemaker or ICD clearance and lotion-free skin per neurophysiology protocol
  3. Warm cool extremities and remove jewelry over planned electrode sites
  4. Begin stimulation despite hand lotion because the clinic schedule is full
Question 8 — Evaluate outcomes

Four hours after nerve conduction studies, the patient reports new bilateral leg weakness and shortness of breath while preliminary results are still pending. What is the best nursing action?

Answer key & rationale

Next step Timed NCLEX Next Gen–style scenarios on NurseOnShift

Frequently Asked Questions

FAQ

What is the difference between a nerve conduction study and EMG?

In practice, nerve conduction studies measure how well nerves send electrical signals using surface electrodes and small shocks, while needle EMG records muscle electrical activity at rest and during contraction. They are often performed together to localize nerve versus muscle disease.

Does a nerve conduction study diagnose the cause of numbness?

No. Nerve conduction studies provide electrophysiology patterns that specialists integrate with history, examination, imaging, and laboratory studies. Nurses support referral and follow-up rather than assigning final diagnoses.

Why must skin be free of lotion before nerve conduction studies?

The NHS advises clean, dry skin without oils or creams so surface electrodes make proper contact. Lotion can invalidate recordings and delay accurate interpretation.

Why does limb temperature matter for nerve conduction studies?

body temperature can affect results. Cool extremities can slow conduction and reduce amplitudes, mimicking neuropathy until the limb is adequately warmed.

Do nerve conduction studies hurt?

The NHS states patients may feel brief tingling or shock sensations during electrical stimulation. Most people complete the test without major problems. Severe pain or vasovagal symptoms should be reported to the team performing the study.

When should nurses escalate after nerve conduction studies?

Escalate rapidly progressive weakness, new bulbar or respiratory symptoms, or clinical deterioration despite a pending formal report according to facility policy.

What related tests are often ordered with nerve conduction studies?

Electromyography is commonly performed in the same visit when weakness suggests muscle or nerve-root involvement. Imaging and laboratory studies may follow depending on suspected neuropathy or entrapment per prescriber pathway.

References

References
  1. MedlinePlus. Nerve Conduction Studies. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
    https://medlineplus.gov/lab-tests/nerve-conduction-studies/
  2. National Health Service. Nerve conduction studies. NHS.uk.
    https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/nerve-conduction-studies/
  3. MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia. Electromyography. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
    https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/003929.htm
  4. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Peripheral Neuropathy. NIH.
    https://www.ninds.nih.gov/health-information/disorders/peripheral-neuropathy
  5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. NIH.
    https://www.ninds.nih.gov/health-information/disorders/carpal-tunnel-syndrome
  6. MedlinePlus. Electromyography (EMG). U.S. National Library of Medicine.
    https://medlineplus.gov/lab-tests/electromyography-emg/
  7. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Guillain-Barré Syndrome. NIH.
    https://www.ninds.nih.gov/health-information/disorders/guillain-barre-syndrome
  8. National Health Service. Electromyography (EMG). NHS.uk.
    https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/electromyography-emg/

Related Topics

Numbness

Common sensory symptom evaluated with nerve conduction studies

Sign or symptom

Tingling

Paresthesia pattern that may prompt electrophysiology referral

Sign or symptom

Muscle Weakness

Motor symptom often paired with NCS when weakness is progressive

Sign or symptom

Neuropathy

Common diagnostic target when conduction is slowed or amplitudes fall

Medical condition

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Focal entrapment neuropathy frequently evaluated with median nerve NCS

Medical condition

Neurological Assessment

Bedside strength and sensation findings that guide NCS referral urgency

Nursing procedure

Editorial Standards & Medical Review

About the author: Sid A. Abdala Balal, RN, writes evidence-based nursing education focused on diagnostic safety, clinical interpretation, and bedside nursing judgment.

Medical review: This guide is reviewed by Dr. Adam Sayedi, MD, for clinical accuracy, diagnostic safety, and alignment with current standards for Nerve Conduction Study.

Policies: Medical Review Process · Editorial Policy · Correction Policy

Evidence-based nursing education and clinical resources

Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Reference ranges, critical values, and protocols may vary by laboratory, institution, patient population, and testing method. Always follow local policy and the reporting laboratory’s reference range. Content written by a Registered Nurse and medically reviewed by Dr. Adam Sayedi, MD. Last reviewed: June 20, 2026.